People rally on Babur square outside the administration building during
the uprising in the city of Andijan, Uzbekistan. Thousands of
protesters jammed into the square, relishing a rare burst of defiance
under
Thousands of protesters jammed into Babur square in
the city of Andijan, relishing a rare burst of defiance as one speaker
after another condemned hardship under Uzbekistan's despotic government.
Hours later, a decade ago Wednesday, hundreds lay
dead in torrents of blood. Troops sent by President Islam Karimov's
Interior Ministry moved to quash the demonstration with ferocious and
unexpected brutality.
Small numbered plaques mark anonymous graves in a cemetery on the
outskirts of Andijan, Uzbekistan. Thousands of protesters jammed into
Babur square, relishing a rare burst of defiance under
Local residents walk with their hands raised as Uzbek soldiers take
positions to disperse protesters on the square outside the
administration building during the uprising in the city of Andijan,
Uzbekistan.
New York-based Human Rights Watch has for a decade accumulated
evidence and testimonies about one of the worst state-sanctioned
massacres in recent history. Ahead of the anniversary, HRW again
demanded that Uzbekistan allow an independent investigation into a
tragedy that has traumatized all but a few into silence.
"There was screaming, the women especially were
crying, 'Don't shoot, don't shoot!' And the shooting continued for about
half an hour," human rights activist Lutfullo Shamsuddinov, who was on
the square that day, told HRW in a report compiled for the anniversary.
"And then it was clear, even clear to the soldiers themselves, that
there was no return fire."
HRW Central Asia researcher Steve Swerdlow said an
investigation was needed to bring closure to those still scarred by the
violence. "There is a pressing need for accountability," Swerdlow said,
"if for no other reason than the extreme pain and anguish that so many
families inside and outside Uzbekistan are still going through."
According to Uzbekistan's official account, around
half of the 187 people killed were armed militants. Other assessments by
international organizations say the bulk of the dead were defenseless
protesters and numbered at least 300 — with some counts rising to nearly
1,000.
AP reporters present in the city that day heard
sustained heavy gunfire from the location of the protest. Uzbek
authorities acted fast to bar international media from freely accessing
the site of the unrest.
Although most in the crowd were unarmed, some
individuals did have guns; they had detained a senior prosecutor sent to
negotiate with demonstrators, which appears to have been sufficient
reason to prompt the bloody crackdown.
In 2005, Uzbekistan was considered a close and
dependable ally for the United States, which was then still embroiled in
large-scale military operations in neighboring Afghanistan. Washington,
however, was unable to ignore calls to condemn the bloodshed in
Andijan.
U.S. criticism of human rights violations elicited a
swift and ill-tempered reaction from the Uzbek authorities.
Significantly for Pentagon planners, the Uzbek government kicked the
U.S. military off its strategic position near the town of Kharshi, well
under an hour's flight from Afghan territory.
The West has largely forgotten the events in
Andijan. But rights activists say authorities in Uzbekistan to this day
continue to hound anybody even loosely involved in the demonstrations.
Many were jailed or fled overseas, so police have since turned their
attention to relatives.
Swerdlow said family members are regularly made
to write confession-style letters referring to their implicated
loved-ones as enemies of the state.
No comments:
Post a Comment