The
provisions of his release were routine yet stark for a man whose career
arc had carried him from revered, small-town wrestling coach to the
Illinois Statehouse and on to one of the top leadership posts in
Congress. In addition to posting a $4,500 bond, Mr. Hastert was ordered
to surrender his passport, remain in the continental United States,
advise the court of any change in his address, and remove guns from his
home within two weeks.
He was also ordered to avoid contact with anyone who might be a witness or an accuser in his case.
Mr.
Hastert waived reading of the charges, and the hearing lasted less than
20 minutes. One of his lawyers, Thomas C. Green, who is from Washington
and has broad experience representing public officials facing criminal
investigations, formally offered the not guilty plea.
Mr. Hastert was indicted
in late May on charges of structuring cash withdrawals and lying to
federal investigators in connection to what prosecutors described as an
arrangement to pay a person, identified only as Individual A, a total of $3.5 million in exchange for not revealing Mr. Hastert’s misconduct against that individual.
Two
people briefed on the evidence uncovered in an F.B.I. investigation
have said that Mr. Hastert, who once taught and coached wrestling at a
high school in suburban Yorkville, Ill., was paying a former student not
to say publicly that Mr. Hastert had sexually abused him decades ago.
According to the indictment, Mr. Hastert, who had a lucrative career as a
Washington lobbyist after leaving Congress in 2007, withdrew $1.7
million over the last four years to pay the individual.
The
indictment does not include charges of sexual abuse. Legal experts said
the statute of limitations had almost certainly run out on any such
claims. Mr. Hastert worked as a teacher and coach in Yorkville, about 50
miles southwest of Chicago, from 1965 to 1981.
Instead,
Mr. Hastert is accused of structuring his cash withdrawals in amounts
less than $10,000 in order to avoid requirements that banks report
larger sums. Generally, such structuring charges
are part of drug or money-laundering cases and accompany other charges,
like tax violations or embezzlement, rather than stand-alone
accusations. While structuring cases can be complicated to prosecute,
former prosecutors said this one appeared to be relatively
straightforward.
No comments:
Post a Comment